Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Update 2006 Reasons for Exclusion

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Update 2006 Reasons for Exclusion

Study Reasons for exclusion
1.              Acil 2004 Pain scores not presented
2.              Agarwal 2003 No VAS pain assessment
3.              Agarwal 2004 Propofol-induced pain not postop-pain
4.              Agnifili 1993 Compares lap chole against open procedure
5.              Akca 2004 Combined lap chole and groin hernia repair groups
6.              Argiriadou 2002 No VAS pain assessment
7.              Assalia 1993 No VAS pain assessment + open cholecystectomy
8.              Assalia 1997 No VAS pain assessment + open cholecystectomy
9.              Awad 2002 No VAS pain assessment
10.          Barkun 1992 Compares lap chole against mini-lap chole procedure
11.          Barkun 1993 Duplicates data in Barkun 1992
12.          Berberoglu 1998 No VAS pain assessment
13.          Berggren 1994 No VAS pain assessment
14.          Berven 1995 RCT – status unclear + no VAS pain assessment
15.          Bhoyrul 2000 Combined procedures
16.          Bisgaard 2002 Not a comparative study
17.          Biswas 2003 No VAS pain assessment
18.          Boldt 1998 Not RCT
19.          Brackman 2002 No VAS pain assessment + cost savings study
20.          Buanes 1993 Not RCT
21.          Buanes 1996 Not RCT
22.          Byrne 1994 Compares lap chole against open procedure
23.          Campbell 2000 No VAS pain assessment
24.          Camus 1995 No VAS pain assessment
25.          Cason 1996 Not RCT
26.          Cete 1996 Conventional cholecystectomy
27.          Chan  1994 Not RCT
28.          Chan 1995 Not RCT
29.          Chen 1995 Not RCT
30.          Chok 2004 Not RCT
31.          Chow 1997 Retrospective
32.          Colak 2004 Compares use vs. re-use of disposable instruments
33.          Collier 1993 Not RCT
34.          Cox 1992 Retrospective
35.          Croce 1999 Not laparoscopic cholecystectomy (duodenal ulcers)
36.          Cunniffe 1998 Mixed laparoscopic procedures
37.          Dahl 1994 Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy
38.          Davides 1999 Not RCT
39.          Dill 2000 Not RCT
40.          Eberhart 1999a No VAS pain assessment
41.          Eberhart 1999b Compares antiemetics not analgesics
42.          Ehsan-ul-Haq 2004 No pain assessment
43.          Eldar 1997 Not RCT
44.          Ell 1990 Piezoelectric lithotripsy
45.          Fiorillo 1996 Not RCT
46.          Frank 1990 Conventional cholecystectomy
47.          Frenette 1991 Conventional cholecystectomy
48.          Fujii 2000 No pain assessment
49.          Fujii 2004 No pain assessment; nausea and vomiting study
50.          Gan 2004b Used Joshi 2004 data, but tested hypothesis that reducing opioid consumption reduced opioid-related side effects
51.          Gharaibeh 2000 No VAS pain assessment
52.          Gillberg 1993 Gynaecological laparoscopy
53.          Golder 1998 No VAS pain assessment specified. Comparison of operative techniques
54.          Gurmarnik 1996 No VAS pain assessment
55.          Habib 2004 No VAS pain assessment
56.          Hakanson 1989 Conventional cholecystectomy
57.          Hanaoka 2004 No VAS pain assessment
58.          Hasaniya 2001 No VAS pain assessment
59.          Helmy 1999 No VAS pain assessment
60.          Hendolin 2000 Compares lap chole against open procedure
61.          Hong  2003b Physiological study, no pain assessment
62.          Hong 2003a Gynaecological laparoscopy
63.          Horattas 2004 No VAS pain assessment
64.          Hsieh 2003 Acute cholecystitis, no VAS assessment
65.          Huang 1990 Conventional cholecystectomy
66.          Inan 2004 Not RCT
67.          Jallali 2004 No VAS pain assessment + not relevant (investigating closure techniques)
68.          Jelicic 1993 Conventional cholecystectomy
69.          Jensen 2002 Laparotomy
70.          Jensen 2004 Used Joshi 2004 data, but investigated the relationship between several predictors and patient satisfaction
71.          Johansson 2005 Compares lap chole vs. open procedure
72.          Joris 1992 Not RCT
73.          Joris 1998 Gastroplasty
74.          Karayiannakis 1997 Compares lap chole vs. open procedure
75.          Kenady 1992 Conventional cholecystectomy
76.          Khan 1997 No VAS pain assessment
77.          Khan 2002 No VAS pain assessment
78.          Kimberley 1996 Not RCT
79.          Kitano 1993 No VAS pain assessment
80.          Klockgether-Radke 1996 No VAS pain assessment
81.          Koivuranta 1996 No VAS pain assessment
82.          Koivusalo  1996 No VAS pain assessment
83.          Koivusalo 1997 No VAS pain assessment
84.          Koivusalo 2000 Review paper
85.          Kolla 2004 Statistical analysis of pain outcomes unclear
86.          Kristiansson 1999 Not RCT
87.          Kum 1994 Not RCT
88.          Lai 1998 No VAS pain assessment
89.          Larsen 2002 Only abstract in English
90.          Laurito 1991 Conventional cholecystectomy
91.          Le Blanc-Louvry 2000 Compares lap chole vs. open procedure
92.          Lee 1990 Conventional cholecystectomy
93.          Lee 2005 Not RCT
94.          Lindgren 1997 No VAS pain assessment
95.          Los 1995 No VAS pain assessment
96.          Lysak 1994 Gynaecological laparoscopy
97.          Madsen 1992 Not RCT
98.          Maidatsi 1998 Conventional cholecystectomy
99.          Majeed 1996 No VAS pain assessment
100.       McCrory 2002 Review paper
101.       McGinn 1995 No VAS pain assessment
102.       McLaughlin 1994 Gynaecological laparoscopy
103.       McMahon 1994a Compares lap chole vs. mini-lap chole
104.       McMahon 1994b Compares lap chole vs. mini-lap chole
105.       Mealy 1992 Not RCT
106.       Morino 1998 No VAS pain assessment + Study about hepatic function
107.       Mrsic 1997 RCT-status unclear
108.       Murrell 1996 Not just lap chole
109.       Naguib 1996 Compares antiemetics not analgesics
110.       Naude 1996 No VAS pain assessment + Study about hormone changes

 111.    Nesek-Adam 2004

Compares antiemetics not analgesics

112.   O’Boyle 2002

Combined procedures Study cited before June 2002, included in initial analysis
113.       O’Dwyer 1992 No VAS pain assessment
114.       Ortega 1995 Appendectomy
115.       Ortega 1996 Compares lap chole vs. open procedure
116.       Oxorn 1989 Conventional cholecystectomy
117.       Ozkocak 2002 Only abstract in English
118.       Paolucci 1995 No VAS pain assessment
119.       Paventi 2001 Compares antiemetics not analgesics
120.       Perry 1993 Gynaecological laparoscopy
121.       Power 1990 Conventional cholecystectomy
122.       Quaynor 2002 No VAS pain assessment
123.       Rademaker 1991 Conventional cholecystectomy
124.       Raeder  1998 VAS pain scores not recorded
125.       Roberts-Thomson 1994 Conventional cholecystectomy
126.       Ros 2004 No VAS pain assessment
127.       Rosenblum 1991 Gynaecological laparoscopy
128.       Ross 1989 Conventional cholecystectomy
129.       Sarli 2001 Combined procedures
130.       Sarli 2001 Not RCT
131.       Schmitz 1997 Conventional cholecystectomy vs. minicholecystectomy
132.       Schroeder 1990 Conventional cholecystectomy
133.       Schulze 1988 Conventional cholecystectomy
134.       Schwenk 2002 Not a comparison of treatment modalities
135.       Scott 1989 Conventional cholecystectomy
136.       Shah 1986 Conventional cholecystectomy
137.       Smith 1993 Procedures other than laparoscopic cholecystectomy
138.       Smythe 1993 No VAS pain assessment. Unclear if any patients received laparoscopic cholecystectomy
139.       So 2002 Compares antiemetics not analgesics
140.       Song 2000 No VAS pain assessment
141.       Squirrell 1998 Comparison of operative procedures not pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
142.       Steffen 1997 Only abstract in English
143.       Steinbrook 1998 Compares antiemetics not analgesics
144.       Sternlo 1992 Conventional cholecystectomy
145.       Striebel 1993 Conventional cholecystectomy
146.       Stromskag 1991 Conventional cholecystectomy
147.       Tarnow 1998 Conventional cholecystectomy
148.       Taylor 1992 No pain assessment included
149.       Trondsen 1993 Compares lap chole vs. open procedure
150.       Ure 1994 Not RCT
151.       Uzunkoy 1999 Duplicates Uzunkoy 2001
152.       Van Delden 2002 No VAS pain assessment + Dose-response study
153.       van Raay 1992 Conventional cholecystectomy
154.       Varrassi 1994 Conventional cholecystectomy
155.       Verborgh 1994 Conventional cholecystectomy
156.       Vetrhus 2004 Combined laparoscopic + open cholecystectomy
157.       Vetrhus 2004 No VAS pain assessment + not relevant (risk assessment study)
158.       Vieira 2004 Only abstract in English
159.       Wajima 1998 Conventional cholecystectomy
160.       Wallin 1988 Conventional cholecystectomy
161.       Wang 2002 Nausea and vomiting study comparing anti-emetic regimens
162.       Wani 2000 Conventional cholecystectomy vs. minicholecystectomy
163.       Weinbroum 2001 No sub-analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients
164.       Westerling 1997 Minilaparotomy
165.       Witjes 1992 Conventional cholecystectomy
166.       Yang 2004 No VAS pain assessment
167.       Yotsui 2001 Not double-blinded. No pain assessment
168.       Yu 2003 No VAS pain assessment
169.       Zhao 2004 Health outcomes analysis of Joshi 2004 data